BounceBan

Free catchall & risky email verification service for

@work-work.no

Work-work.no uses several email formats for their employees' email addresses. The most common and accurate format is {{{first.all_word_i}{last.all_words}} (e.g. {{j-smith@work-work.no}). Other email formats used by work-work include: {{{first.first_word_i}{last.first_word}} (e.g. {{jsmith@work-work.no}), {{{first.first_word_i}{last.last_word}} (e.g. {{jsmith@work-work.no}), {{{first.first_word}{last.first_word_i}} (e.g. {{johns@work-work.no}). In total, work-work employs up to five different email address patterns for their employees.

Unlimited single email verifications free forever!

Email patterns for @work-work.no employees

Possible emails Percentage Action
j-smith@work-work.no 26% Verify
jsmith@work-work.no 23% Verify
jsmith@work-work.no 18% Verify
johns@work-work.no 12% Verify

Verifying Catchall Emails at work-work.no: A Comprehensive Guide to Using BounceBan

As a professional in the philanthropy industry, you understand the importance of maintaining a clean and accurate email list. However, verifying emails from certain domains can be a daunting task, especially when dealing with catchall emails. In this article, we will explore the challenges of verifying emails at work-work.no and how BounceBan can help you overcome these obstacles.

Understanding work-work.no

Before we dive into the world of email verification, let's take a brief look at work-work.no. This philanthropy-based company, located in Trondheim, Sor-Trondelag, Norway, uses the email domain work-work.no. Interestingly, their email pattern distribution is as follows:

  • j-smith@work-work.no (26%)
  • jsmith@work-work.no (23%)
  • jsmith@work-work.no (18%)
  • johns@work-work.no (12%)

Their most common email pattern is j-smith@work-work.no, accounting for 26% of their email addresses.

Challenges of Verifying Emails at work-work.no

Verifying emails from work-work.no can be challenging due to several reasons:

  • Catchall Emails: work-work.no uses catchall emails, which can make it difficult for traditional verification services to accurately verify emails. Catchall emails are email addresses that are not explicitly defined but still accept emails.
  • Email Security Gateways: There is no information about whether work-work.no uses email security gateways (ESG) like Cisco Secure Email (ESA), Barracuda, Proofpoint, Abnormal Security, Mimecast, SpamTitan, Checkpoint, Forrester, or Sophos. If they do, it could make simple SMTP tests fail.
  • Risky Emails: Some emails may not always return a bounce message, even when sending test messages to invalid email addresses at work-work.no. This can lead to inaccurate verification results.

Risks of Not Verifying Emails at work-work.no

Failing to verify emails at work-work.no can result in:

  • High Bounce Rates: If you don't verify emails, your list will be outdated, leading to high bounce rates. This can damage your sending reputation, lower delivery rates, and negatively impact open and click rates.
  • Risky Emails: Other services may leave most emails at work-work.no as risky, leaving you unsure of how to handle them. If you keep them, you risk a high bounce rate; if you delete them, you may miss out on valuable valid emails.

Using BounceBan to Verify Emails from work-work.no

Fortunately, BounceBan is capable of reliably verifying catchall emails and emails behind Email Security Gateways. Here's how to use BounceBan to verify emails from work-work.no:

Why Choose BounceBan?

BounceBan is the only service capable of reliably verifying catchall emails and emails behind Email Security Gateways. Unlike other services like Emailable, NeverBounce, ZeroBounce, DeBounce, SendGrid, Snov, RocketReach, and Hunter, BounceBan can accurately verify over 80% of catchall emails with a 97%+ accuracy rate. Catchall emails that cannot be verified with certainty will be tagged as 'risky', accounting for about 20% or less.

Frequently Asked Questions

General FAQs about Verifying Catchall Risky Emails from work-work.no

  1. What is a catchall email? A catchall email is an email address that is not explicitly defined but still accepts emails.

  2. Why are catchall emails challenging to verify? Catchall emails are difficult to verify because they are not explicitly defined, making it hard for traditional verification services to accurately verify them.

  3. Can BounceBan verify catchall emails? Yes, BounceBan is capable of reliably verifying catchall emails and emails behind Email Security Gateways.

  4. What is the risk of not verifying emails at work-work.no? If you don't verify emails, your list will be outdated, leading to high bounce rates, damaging your sending reputation, and negatively impacting open and click rates.

  5. How does BounceBan verify emails? BounceBan uses an AI fine-tuned with lots of signals to accurately verify all emails, including catchall emails, without sending actual emails, making it GDPR-compliant.

FAQs about How BounceBan Can Help in Verifying Emails at work-work.no

  1. Can BounceBan verify emails from work-work.no? Yes, BounceBan can verify emails from work-work.no, including catchall emails.

  2. How accurate is BounceBan in verifying catchall emails? BounceBan can accurately verify over 80% of catchall emails with a 97%+ accuracy rate.

  3. Is BounceBan GDPR-compliant? Yes, BounceBan is GDPR-compliant as it doesn't send actual emails to verify emails.

  4. Can I integrate BounceBan with my existing system? Yes, developers can easily integrate BounceBan via the APIs.

  5. How fast is BounceBan's verification process? BounceBan's verification process is fast, taking only a few seconds for most emails. For a small share of catchall emails, it may take a few minutes.

FAQs about Basic Information of work-work.no

  1. What is the domain of work-work.no? The domain of work-work.no is work-work.no.

  2. What is the industry of work-work.no? The industry of work-work.no is philanthropy.

  3. Where is work-work.no located? work-work.no is located in Trondheim, Sor-Trondelag, Norway.

  4. What is the most common email pattern at work-work.no? The most common email pattern at work-work.no is j-smith@work-work.no, accounting for 26% of their email addresses.

  5. What are the MX records of work-work.no? The MX records of work-work.no are aspmx.l.google.com, alt1.aspmx.l.google.com, alt2.aspmx.l.google.com, aspmx2.googlemail.com, and aspmx3.googlemail.com.

  6. Does work-work.no use email security gateways? There is no information about whether work-work.no uses email security gateways.

  7. What is the email pattern distribution of work-work.no? The email pattern distribution of work-work.no is j-smith@work-work.no (26%), jsmith@work-work.no (23%), jsmith@work-work.no (18%), and johns@work-work.no (12%).

  8. Can I use BounceBan to verify emails from other domains? Yes, you can use BounceBan to verify emails from other domains in addition to work-work.no.

  9. How do I get started with BounceBan? Create a free account at https://bounceban.com/ to get started.

  10. What if I have more questions about BounceBan? You can find more information in BounceBan's detailed knowledge base at https://bounceban.tawk.help.

By using BounceBan to verify emails from work-work.no, you can ensure that your email list is accurate, reducing bounce rates and improving your sending reputation. Try BounceBan today and experience the power of accurate email verification!

Email patterns for similar companies

Domain Catchall Verifiable Top email pattern Percentage
villasfoch.fr Yes Yes j.smith@villasfoch.fr 29% view email patterns for villasfoch.fr
toolit.gr Yes Yes smith.john@toolit.gr 28% view email patterns for toolit.gr
topdocclinics.com Yes Yes john.s@topdocclinics.com 30% view email patterns for topdocclinics.com
x.rive.money Yes Yes johnsmith@x.rive.money 23% view email patterns for x.rive.money
tinybitstudios.com Yes Yes j.smith@tinybitstudios.com 21% view email patterns for tinybitstudios.com